Worthy of Their Attention
The horn can make someone turn.
What happens next decides the relationship.
Business brings us into a relationship with strangers and money. Before a stranger buys anything from us, we often attempt to interrupt something they are already doing.
We send an email. We deliver a text message. We place a headline in their path. We introduce something designed to move their attention toward us.
The first question is whether we can capture their attention. The deeper question is whether the interruption is worthy of it.
Those questions have different answers. A business can become exceptionally good at capturing attention while steadily giving strangers reasons to distrust it.
Reality Is Relation. Attention Is Participation.
The Reality Equation begins with a relation: Actual divided by Expectation. The quotient is Reality, expressed as R.
R = Actual / Expectation
Two students attend the same wedding. One describes it as magnificent. The other describes it as horrific. The wedding supplies the same Actual to both. Their Expectations differ. Consequently, their Realities differ.
The relation belongs to the entity experiencing it. We cannot understand the student’s Reality by examining the wedding alone. We have to account for the Expectation through which that wedding was received.
Attention comes next. It is a function applied to the Reality already given:
S = ln(R)
R must be there before the function can operate. In this calculation, R is not an unknown we are trying to solve. It names the given Reality at that moment. That number changes as Actual and Expectation change, but the calculation always begins with a value already present.
We solve for S.
In my earlier essay, The Attention Thief, the sequence runs from prediction through mismatch and surprise into attention and felt experience. Capture precedes the judgment we make about what captured us.
Within this framework, S expresses surprise as the signal that recruits attention. Its magnitude tells us the strength of the demand for participation. A large positive value and a large negative value can both take attention. The sign does not establish whether the event deserves our approval, or whether the interruption was worthy.
Here we are using the positive, real-valued form of R, for which the natural logarithm is defined. These equations state the conceptual framework; they do not assign a moral score to an interruption.
Reality is the relation. Attention is participation in what that relation brings forward.
The Horn Takes Your Attention
You are driving. Another driver sounds a horn.
The horn is present in Actual. It was absent from what you expected. The resulting departure produces a demand for attention. You turn toward the sound, inspect your surroundings, and try to determine what happened.
You did not first decide that the horn deserved consideration. You are already attending.
This is what it means to say that attention is stolen. Something has entered your experience with enough force to take your participation.
Now suppose the driver is warning you that you are about to enter an occupied lane. You recognize the danger and correct your movement. The interruption was worthy of your attention.
Or you are stopped at a light that has turned green. A brief horn brings you back to the road. You recognize something useful about your situation and act.
Now consider a driver who sounds the horn to express frustration. There is no warning, no useful correction, and nothing you need to discover. The driver wants to express anger and uses your attention as part of that expression.
The horn works in every case. It takes attention.
But you experience the acts differently.
Three messages. Three relationships.
Open each message to consider what the interruption leaves behind. These are illustrative situations; the recipient’s circumstances still decide.
Your delivery address appears incomplete.
The message identifies the problem, names the affected order, and offers a direct way to correct it. The interruption helps the customer receive something already wanted. Its urgency belongs to an actual obligation.
Your requested appointment is available.
A useful signal returns to an intention the recipient already expressed. The sender earns its place by making the next action clear and leaving the recipient free to decline.
URGENT: You are about to miss out.
If the alarm conceals an ordinary sales pitch, the sender has borrowed the emotional force of danger for its own purpose. The phone was opened. The next message may be blocked.
Capture and Worthiness Are Different Judgments
The equation accounts for the demand on attention. Worthiness introduces a qualitative judgment that belongs to the entity receiving the interruption.
That judgment does not require a carefully worded conclusion. You feel gratitude toward the driver who warned you. You feel irritation toward the driver who imposed anger upon you.
The second driver has revealed something about the relationship. Their frustration mattered enough to interrupt your peace. Your experience did not matter enough to restrain them.
You remember that.
The same thing happens when a business reaches you. An email can make you look and still leave you feeling manipulated. A text can successfully bring the phone into your hand and make its sender less welcome. An advertisement can become unforgettable because you resent it.
The sender captured attention. The recipient judged the capture unworthy.
No amount of success in the first operation settles the second.
In The Great Reallocation, Part Four: The Age of Attention, I separated salience from meaning: what seizes the foreground and what deserves a place there. Here that distinction becomes a business obligation. The sender can manufacture the first encounter. The recipient lives its consequences.
The Stranger Is Also Living a Life
Calling someone a prospect describes their position in your business. It does not describe the life they are living when your message arrives.
They are feeding a child, finishing a task, having a conversation, or simply enjoying a quiet moment. Their attention already participates in something. Your interruption enters that participation.
This is why human attention has an importance more fundamental than the assets we usually describe as valuable. Oil can be stored. Money can remain in an account. A building can stand unused. But lived experience requires participation.
What you attend to is your life as you experience it.
Much continues beyond your attention. You do not consciously supervise every heartbeat or witness every event around you. But what takes your attention enters the experience through which your life is lived.
When a business interrupts someone, it acts upon that experience. The interruption may be brief. Its significance is not exhausted by its duration.
A moment of useful warning and a moment of imposed anger can occupy the same amount of time. They leave different relationships behind.
Money Can Conceal the Other Dimension
Business involves both strangers and money.
In Business Begins with Strangers and Money, the kitchen makes the relationship visible. The mother in her kitchen recognizes that she can prepare meals for strangers who will pay her. She already knows how to buy ingredients, prepare food, and serve a meal. She sees money to be made by extending an activity she already performs.
That is a recognizable business opportunity.
But if her attention remains entirely on the money, the strangers become instruments in her calculation. How many can she reach? How many orders can she obtain? How much can she charge?
The same narrowing occurs in marketing. Does the email drive traffic? Does the text convert? Does the offer increase sales?
These questions measure consequences for the sender. They do not establish whether the recipient experienced the interruption as worthy.
A customer can make a purchase and still decide never to deal with the business again. A campaign can produce revenue while teaching many more people to block its sender. The money arrives now. The damage to the relationship becomes visible later.
The business has measured one dimension while consuming the other.
This extends the problem in Money Did Not Corrupt the Company. It Outbid the Customer. Financial changes are made immediate and visible; changes in the customer relationship can remain buried. A campaign report may show the order long before it shows the distrust.
A Strong Result Can Hide a Weak Relationship
Stellantis offers a warning about treating financial performance as sufficient evidence of a sound business. In its 2022 results, it reported record performance, including €16.8 billion in net profit and €23.3 billion in adjusted operating income.
In its 2025 results, it reported a €22.3 billion net loss, driven by €25.4 billion in unusual charges. The company also cited changes in regulatory frameworks in explaining the charges. Its explanation emphasized a strategic reset around customer preferences and freedom of choice.
These figures do not establish that unworthy marketing caused the reversal. They illustrate the broader danger: exemplary financial results in one period do not establish that the relationship with customers is being sustained.
A business organized exclusively around extracting a financial result can look successful while weakening the conditions that make future results possible.
The same danger exists at the scale of a single message. A conversion tells you that someone acted. It does not tell you what they now think of you.
The Recipient Decides
You can learn how to capture attention. You can develop offers, headlines, and messages that create a strong departure from Expectation. You can become skilled at making strangers look.
You cannot assign worthiness to the interruption on their behalf.
The recipient decides. Sometimes the judgment becomes a conscious thought. Sometimes it appears first as a feeling. Eventually, it can become an action: unsubscribe, block, report spam, refuse the next offer.
People can become more discriminating about what attempts to take their attention. They recognize the alarm that conceals a sales pitch. They recognize the urgency that exists only because the sender wants a response. They recognize the business equivalent of an angry horn.
That recognition matters to anyone who expects to remain in a relationship with strangers over time.
Before sending the email, delivering the text, presenting the offer, or making the announcement, ask: Is this worthy of their attention?
Your desire to be noticed cannot answer that question. Your need for revenue cannot answer it. Even your ability to make them look cannot answer it.
The answer depends on the person whose life you are entering. That includes the moment you enter it. A worthy subject can still arrive unworthily; the importance of what you offer does not establish that it belongs in their attention now.
When strangers judge your interruptions unworthy, they begin protecting their lives from your business. The eventual loss of access to their money can begin with a more fundamental loss: they no longer trust you with their attention.
Your desire to be noticed cannot tell you whether you deserve to be.
2 thoughts on “Worthy of Their Attention”