Toward a Physics of Human Interaction
In our ongoing inquiry into reconfiguration, we’ve seen that transformation does not arise from effort or love, but from interaction—the precise relational conditions under which energy, already present, is allowed to do something new.
The question now is: Are there consistent, observable dynamics in human-to-human interaction that we can begin to treat experimentally?
Not anecdotally. Not philosophically. But experimentally.
This article introduces Experiment 001: Speaking in the Past Tense.
It’s not a theory. It’s not a belief. It’s a controlled observation of an action and its reaction.
The action is yours. The reaction is theirs.
Setup: How to Run the Experiment
This is a human-to-human interaction.
You’re going to take the first action.
The other human will be the one whose reaction you observe.
Here’s the protocol:
- Speak in the past tense about something you have already done.
- That’s it.
Not what you plan to do.
Not what you might do.
Not what you’re thinking about doing.
But what you did.
Examples:
- “I paid rent.”
- “I finished that design.”
- “I called her back yesterday.”
- “I already cleaned the kitchen.”
- “I fixed the broken lock.”
Avoid statements like:
- “I’ll pay rent tomorrow.”
- “I’m planning to finish it soon.”
- “I might get to it tonight.”
- “I’m thinking about starting next week.”
Again, this is not about communication style or moral uprightness.
This is about running a clean experiment.
The only thing that matters here is: How do they react?
What to Observe
Do not interpret. Do not theorize. Do not try to manipulate.
Just watch.
Observe the other person’s:
- Facial expression
- Eye movement (including dilation or stillness)
- Posture shifts
- Breathing patterns
- Tonal response
- Level of engagement
- Quality of attention
Does something perk up?
Do they become more present, more attentive, more interested?
Does the space between you sharpen?
You’re not measuring compliance. You’re measuring resonance.
You’re not trying to be persuasive. You’re measuring reaction.
What You May Discover
If your experience aligns with mine—after 15½ years of running this same experiment—you’ll begin to notice something strange and consistent:
People react differently when you speak in the past tense.
And not just people in general. All kinds of people.
People in good moods. Bad moods. People with clinical diagnoses.
People in love, in pain, in power, in exhaustion.
The reaction may vary in magnitude, but not in kind.
There is something about past tense statements—about completed action—that seems to produce a recognizable physiological and attentional reaction in other humans.
Why Might This Be Happening?
Though we are not making claims in this experiment, I offer here a hypothesis—not as part of the experiment, but as an interpretive side-note for deeper inquiry.
Inside every human being is what I call a constellation of ideas—stable, ancient thought-patterns that operate independently of the person’s mood, ego, or beliefs. These ideas are not imaginary. They are entities, in the Jungian sense: they act as agents. They have aims. They want to actualize.
When you speak in the past tense—when you describe something already done—something in the other human being notices.
The reaction you’re observing may not be the person reacting.
It may be the ideas within them responding to the presence of a fellow actualizer.
Because ideas—at their core—desire only one thing:
To leave their mark on the Immutable Past.
And when they hear you say “I already did this,”
you become—at least in that moment—a worthy host.
Their field sharpens.
Their gaze steadies.
The space shifts.
The configuration reconfigures.
Why This Experiment Matters
We live in an age of endless speaking:
A constant stream of intention, planning, speculation, and future-orientation.
But very little of it lands.
Most of what we say passes through others without registering.
The path integral sums to zero.
The field remains unchanged.
But some speech causes a reaction.
It creates tension. It invokes response. It reconfigures the space.
And among the clearest, simplest, most repeatable variables I’ve found is tense.
Not emotional intensity.
Not charisma.
Not brilliance.
Just this: past tense speech generates a different kind of human reaction.
A Note on Experimental Interference
Naturally, as in any field experiment, there will be distortions.
There will be days when the field is noisy.
There will be moments when the receiver is too exhausted, too distracted, or too dysregulated to react clearly.
There are extreme contexts—like trying to measure gravitational attraction in a wind tunnel.
But that doesn’t negate the pattern.
If you do this often enough, attentively enough, and precisely enough,
you will begin to notice that past tense language enters the human field differently than speculative or future-tense speech.
It doesn’t always explode.
But it almost always registers.
Final Reminder: Keep the Focus Clean
Remember: you are not measuring yourself.
Your own beliefs, ideas, hopes, fears—none of that matters here.
You are the initiator. You provide the action.
But what you’re studying is the reaction.
Your job is to deliver one clean variable: a past-tense statement.
Then—observe.
If you stay focused on their response—no matter how subtle—you are doing the experiment properly.
Try It. Log It. Notice the Pattern.
You don’t need to write anything down, though you can.
You don’t need to predict the reaction.
Just run the experiment again and again.
In different environments.
With different people.
At different levels of intimacy.
Over time, patterns will emerge.
You’ll begin to recognize what I call reconfiguration signatures:
Small tells, glances, shifts that mark a resonant interaction.
And this, perhaps, will be your first entry point into the true study of human-to-human interaction as an energetic and observable field.
This is Experiment 001.
It’s simple. Precise. Repeatable.
And it may be the first principle in a new kind of physics:
The physics of attention, resonance, and human reconfiguration.
1 thought on “The First Human Interaction Experiment: Speak in the Past Tense”